Writing Papers on the Training Ground: A Certain Center of the Information Support Force Guides Scientific Research Personnel to Conduct Research for War
把论文写在演兵场,信息支援部队某中心引导科研人员为战而研
Processing status
Analyzed
Passed relevance screening and completed analysis. English title and summary are machine-generated.
Provenance
| Desk | China Desk |
|---|---|
| Publishing institution | CMC Political Work Department |
| Source outlet | PLA Daily (解放军报) |
| Source language | zh-Hans |
| Source-stated publication date | 2026-05-18 |
| Original URL | http://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16461595.html |
| Collected at | 2026-05-18 13:58:46 |
| Content fingerprint | cd597d7701144a8ce1503f5a1cb68d0009bdd30016f5ee60b5e323e9582c9c5f |
| Collection run | 30 |
| Analysis model | claude-sonnet-4-6 |
| Prompt version | v1 |
Stored source text
信息支援部队某中心引导科研人员为战而研—— 论文写在演兵场 成果服务战斗力 ■马 璟 解放军报特约记者 张勤琳 训练场上,某型主战装备发出巨大的轰鸣声,多名军士正紧盯装备运行数据。不远处的帐篷里,信息支援部队某中心科研人员对照刚采集到的参数,快速修改技术方案。这是该中心党委树立为战而研导向带来的可喜变化。 过去一段时间,该中心面临科研与实战“两张皮”的困境:成果鉴定标注“技术先进”,拿到演训场上却“水土不服”;论文模型设计精巧,却解决不了部队的急难愁盼。“军事科研的根在战场,脱离实战的研究就是空中楼阁。”该中心领导的一番话,让一度陷入误区的科研人员幡然醒悟。 破局,从思想深处开始。该中心党委领导分头深入基层,引导各级党组织把组织生活会开成“揭短会”,和官兵一起在反思辨析中统一思想认识。高级工程师师峰率先自我剖析:“我们研发的信息系统,真的能通过未来战场检验吗?”一句直击要害的反问,引发大家深刻反思:课题立项是否符合战场需求?研究过程是否紧贴实战?科研成果是否有助于提升战斗力? 廓清思想迷雾,变革紧随其后。该中心党委打破“重论文、轻实战”的传统评价模式,建立分类分层的科研评价体系:对周期长、见效慢的基础研究,科学设立“静默培育期”,给潜心钻研的科研人员减压松绑;对紧贴实战的应用研究,以部队演训实效作为关键评价指标,确保课题研究精准对接部队备战打仗难题。 制度的变革,激活科研创新“一池春水”。该中心某科研团队主动沉到训练一线找课题,通过采集分析一手数据,精准定位某型装备设计缺陷,并针对性制订工艺改进方案,有效降低了故障率。 如今,该中心科研人员自觉把论文写在演兵场上,先后取得一批源自部队、聚焦打赢的科研成果。“我们要进一步立起为战而研鲜明导向,让军事科研的每一分投入、每一项产出,都能服务部队战斗力。”该中心领导说。
Summary
Machine summary
A center of the PLA Information Support Force, identified only by type, has restructured its scientific research evaluation system to weight applied research by performance in troop exercises rather than by publications, after its Party committee diagnosed a persistent disconnect between certified technical results and field utility. The article documents a known institutional problem in PLA defense research—the 'two separate skins' gap between laboratory outputs and operational requirements—and records one unit's attempt to close it through tiered evaluation criteria and mandatory field embeds for research personnel. The specific mention of a classified evaluation system with a protected 'silent cultivation period' for basic research raises the question of how the Information Support Force is balancing long-horizon capability development against near-term combat readiness pressure.
What this record supports
- Source record This item was published at the URL above on the date the source stated.
- Official claim Its contents are that institution's assertions.
It does not establish that the described events occurred, that any capability exists, or that the institution's stated position is its actual policy.
Cite this record
Source text. CMC Political Work Department. "把论文写在演兵场,信息支援部队某中心引导科研人员为战而研." PLA Daily (解放军报), 2026-05-18. http://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16461595.html.
As held. Indo-Pacific Record, China Desk Corpus, Record 385, Snapshot — 2026-08-26 (3,574 records).