Indo-Pacific Record

Official defense and security texts, preserved as published and analyzed in context.

Collection is current; analysis is behind it. Records dated after 2026-08-24 are stored and awaiting screening. What these dates mean.

← Corpus by week

Source record CMC Political Work Department · 2026-07-09

US' criticism on China's missile test typical example of double standards and hegemonism, says FM spokesperson

Processing status

Awaiting screening

Stored but not yet screened for relevance. No judgment of any kind has been made about this record.

Provenance

What is known about this record and where each part came from.
DeskChina Desk
Publishing institutionCMC Political Work Department
Source outletChina Military Online (EN) (china_mil_online)
Source languageen — an attribute of the source, not of this record
Source-stated publication date2026-07-09
Original URLhttp://eng.chinamil.com.cn/2025xb/V_251452/16472781.html
Collected at2026-07-09 15:42:10 — collection metadata, not a publication time
Content fingerprintd538ad1eb57c91f0d4938ee54a71b96de3f0a1bf75ca3163a5c573753f708504 — taken when the record was captured, over the stored original title and text
Collection run83

Every field above is defined in the data dictionary — what it means, when it may be absent, and where it stops being reliable.

Stored source text

Text captured from the source page. Extraction may omit material or include unrelated page elements; consult the original URL when exact wording or completeness matters.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning China called the US' criticism on China's recent missile test a typical example of double standards and hegemonism, urging it to view China's national defense and military development in an objective and rational manner, as the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson said in response to a question related to the latest criticism from US State Department on China's recent missile test. China has repeatedly emphasized that the missile launch was a routine arrangement of the annual military training program. It was aimed at verifying the reliability, safety, and effectiveness of relevant weapon systems, Mao Ning, the spokesperson said on Thursday when asked about the US State Department claiming that China informed the US too late and failed to provide sufficient detail. The US side also claimed that the information released by China fell considerably short of standards adopted by all ⁠other P5 nuclear weapon states. The activity was in line with international law and international practices, was not directed at any specific country or target, and China promptly released relevant information and provided advance notification to the US and other countries. This demonstrated the openness and transparency of the Chinese military, Mao said. Mao noted that the US, as the only country in the world that has actually used nuclear weapons and the country with the world's largest and most advanced nuclear arsenal, conducts strategic missile launches from nuclear submarines every year, yet it criticizes and interferes in China's normal missile launch. "This is a typical example of double standards and hegemonism," she said, noting that the US should view China's national defense and military development in an objective and rational manner and make genuine efforts to safeguard global strategic stability.

What this record supports

It does not establish that the described events occurred, that any capability exists, or that the institution's stated position is its actual policy.

Cite this record

Two separate claims, cited separately: the item as its publisher issued it, and the record as this corpus holds it.

Source text. CMC Political Work Department. "US' criticism on China's missile test typical example of double standards and hegemonism, says FM spokesperson." China Military Online (EN), 2026-07-09. http://eng.chinamil.com.cn/2025xb/V_251452/16472781.html.

As held. Indo-Pacific Record, China Desk Corpus, Record 2297, Snapshot — 2026-08-26 (3,574 records).

Processing note. This record has not been screened. No judgment of any kind has been made about it.

The record number and this record path are locators inside the 2026-08-26 snapshot. Neither is a DOI, accession number, permanent identifier, public permalink, or published route. See identifiers and citation guidance.