Indo-Pacific Record

Official defense and security texts, preserved as published and analyzed in context.

Collection is current; analysis is behind it. Records dated after 2026-08-24 are stored and awaiting screening. What these dates mean.

← Corpus by week

Source record CMC Political Work Department · 2026-06-25

Japan Smears China's Defense Expenditure by Peddling Conspiracy Theory to Cover up Its Remilitarization: Defense Spokesperson

Processing status

Awaiting screening

Stored but not yet screened for relevance. No judgment of any kind has been made about this record.

Provenance

What is known about this record and where each part came from.
DeskChina Desk
Publishing institutionCMC Political Work Department
Source outletChina Military Online (EN) (china_mil_online)
Source languageen — an attribute of the source, not of this record
Source-stated publication date2026-06-25
Original URLhttp://eng.chinamil.com.cn/2025xb/V_251452/16469698.html
Collected at2026-06-25 15:24:20 — collection metadata, not a publication time
Content fingerprint7907280f564cca46b7c9b6b3ea7732fb1a043b9dd071c5f00109d7a5de8bb7d8 — taken when the record was captured, over the stored original title and text
Collection run68

Every field above is defined in the data dictionary — what it means, when it may be absent, and where it stops being reliable.

Stored source text

Text captured from the source page. Extraction may omit material or include unrelated page elements; consult the original URL when exact wording or completeness matters.

BEIJING, June 25 -- "It is Japan that truly owes the world a clear explanation: as neo-militarism grows into a greater threat, where is Japan heading for?" asked Senior Colonel Zhang Xiaogang, spokesperson for China's Ministry of National Defense(MND), at a press conference on Thursday. According to media reports, the Japanese defense minister once again questioned the transparency of China's defense budget and claimed that Japan would invest in new operational capabilities including drones and AI in a transparent manner to adapt to the evolving nature of conflicts. "China's defense expenditure is open and transparent. As required by the Chinese laws, we release information on China's total defense budget as well as its scale, composition and usage every year. China is an active participant in the UN military expenditure transparency mechanism and has submitted annual military expenditure reports of the previous fiscal year to the UN since 2008. China's defense expenditure remains at a reasonable, moderate and restrained level, which accounts for less than 1.5% of our GDP for a long time," said the spokesperson. "In contrast, Japan, as a defeated nation in World War II, has rapidly increased its defense budget for 14 consecutive years. Its defense spending has drastically increased to 2% of its GDP, and the government plans to further raise this ratio to 3.5%. Japan's per capita defense spending is more than three times that of China," the spokesperson emphasized. Quoting a Chinese old saying, "the innocent are innocent and the guilty are guilty", the spokesperson stressed that the Japanese side has long smeared China's defense expenditure by peddling conspiracy theory in a bid to divert attention, mislead public opinion, and cover up its ambition and actions in remilitarization.

What this record supports

It does not establish that the described events occurred, that any capability exists, or that the institution's stated position is its actual policy.

Cite this record

Two separate claims, cited separately: the item as its publisher issued it, and the record as this corpus holds it.

Source text. CMC Political Work Department. "Japan Smears China's Defense Expenditure by Peddling Conspiracy Theory to Cover up Its Remilitarization: Defense Spokesperson." China Military Online (EN), 2026-06-25. http://eng.chinamil.com.cn/2025xb/V_251452/16469698.html.

As held. Indo-Pacific Record, China Desk Corpus, Record 1776, Snapshot — 2026-08-26 (3,574 records).

Processing note. This record has not been screened. No judgment of any kind has been made about it.

The record number and this record path are locators inside the 2026-08-26 snapshot. Neither is a DOI, accession number, permanent identifier, public permalink, or published route. See identifiers and citation guidance.