Source record CMC Political Work Department · 2026-06-02

Political Rectification Training in My Eyes | Let the View of Political Achievement Return from 'Looking at Traces' to 'Looking at Real Results'

我眼中的政治整训丨让政绩观从“看痕迹”回归“看实绩”

Machine translation The heading is a machine translation of the original title above. Not reviewed by a human.

Processing status

Analyzed

Passed relevance screening and completed analysis. English title and summary are machine-generated.

Machine assessment Not flagged for closer review. This is a software triage result, not an editorial judgment.

Provenance

What is known about this record and where each part came from.
Desk	China Desk
Publishing institution	CMC Political Work Department
Source outlet	PLA Daily (解放军报) (pla_daily)
Source language	zh-Hans — an attribute of the source, not of this record
Source-stated publication date	2026-06-02
Original URL	http://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16464988.html
Collected at	2026-06-02 17:02:07 — collection metadata, not a publication time
Content fingerprint	661514014f68ea679dc7f8c1527d64a688f462bfe1930837fc151e28f9238431 — taken when the record was captured, over the stored original title and text
Collection run	45
Analysis model	claude-sonnet-4-6
Prompt version	v1

Every field above is defined in the data dictionary — what it means, when it may be absent, and where it stops being reliable.

Stored source text

Text captured from the source page. Extraction may omit material or include unrelated page elements; consult the original URL when exact wording or completeness matters.

若是真金何须镀 ■王可可前不久，我带着机关同志到基层营连检查政治工作落实情况。翻开一本本装帧精美、分类详细的台账，记录完整、要素齐全，看起来工作扎实、一丝不苟。可当我走进班排随机与几名战士座谈，询问对理论学习、心理服务等工作的感受时，有战士直言获得感不强。回到机关，我翻阅各业务科室之前递交的蹲点调研报告，发现有同样的问题。一些报告虽然行文规范，但一谈到实际问题或解决方案时，要么一笔带过、泛泛而谈，要么大而化之、撒胡椒面。看得出这些调研报告大概率是为了完成蹲点任务而做的“留痕工作”。我认识到问题的严重性，当即在部里召开会议，严肃问道：“对于基层建设，到底摸了什么实情？‘痕迹’与‘实绩’匹不匹配？如果只有数量没有质量，报告有什么用？”会议室一片沉寂，大家陷入了沉思。近年来，各级领导和机关持续深化政治整训，高度重视整治形式主义为基层减负，形式主义之风得到有效遏制。但同时也要清醒看到，一些痼疾仍未彻底清除，把“留痕了”当“干完了”的不良风气仍在潜滋暗长，有时对痕迹的管理甚至超越了内容本身。究其根源，还在于思想偏差、作风不实。一方面，痕迹看得见、好展示、易考核，实绩却要沉下身子、直面矛盾、担当作为，所以个别干部宁愿做表面文章、搞纸面落实，将大量的精力投入到花里胡哨的“花架子”上，也不愿啃“硬骨头”、解真难题。同时，正如人们常说的“上有所好，下必甚焉”，机关作为政策制定者、工作指导者、成效评判者，一旦把“看报告、查材料”作为检验标准，就会倒逼基层陷入补资料、整台账、应付检查的内耗，不得不“采华名”而“兴伪事”。有句诗写得好：“假金方用真金镀，若是真金不镀金。”把留痕当政绩，把作秀当做事，看似花团锦簇，而一旦表面“镀”的这层“金”被剔除掉，暴露的就只会是中看不中用的假政绩。持续深化政治整训，必须向“把痕迹当政绩”的顽瘴痼疾开刀，向形式主义、官僚主义亮剑，从思想根源纠偏正向，整掉漂浮虚功、整掉推诿懈怠，真正把一抓到底的严实作风找回来，把求真务实的工作标准立起来，让政绩观从“看痕迹”回归“看实绩”。认识到位，行动更要到位。此后，我们推行了3项举措：一是从“纸面”到“直面”，机关下基层不能以台账、报告等书面材料作为检查依据；二是从“提问”到“解题”，从机关到基层，工作重点必须放在解决实际问题上，而不是把精力放在“留痕”造册上；三是从“讲评”到“被评”，每季度通过机关基层“双向讲评”来检验工作实绩，倒逼破除只“留痕”不“留绩”的顽瘴痼疾，实现“不图痕迹齐全，只求实效明显”的目标。理念一转，实效立显。此前，一名战士家属遭遇涉法维权难题，保卫科摒弃材料先行、留痕为先的惯性，当天就到连队摸排实情，3天内协调地方部门、对接法律援助，全程跟踪处置，直至问题妥善化解。科室汇报仅一句话：“问题解决，家属安心。”没有复杂台账、没有刻意留痕，却用实打实的成效赢得官兵认可。通过这些转变，我也深刻认识到：“痕迹”不等于实绩，留“痕”更要留“心”，重“迹”更要重“绩”。把痕迹当政绩，丢的是人心；用实绩说话，赢的是凝聚力和战斗力。持续深化政治整训，我们必须把功夫下在察实情、出实招、办实事、求实效上，让工作实绩真正成为最亮眼的政绩。

Summary

Machine summary

A headquarters organ official—identified only as Wang Keke—describes conducting grassroots inspections and finding that political work ledgers were formally complete but disconnected from actual soldier experience, then implementing three procedural reforms: banning ledger-based inspections, shifting focus from documentation to problem-solving, and instituting quarterly two-way assessments between headquarters and grassroots units. The article documents a persistent institutional problem the PLA has named but not solved: assessment systems that reward documentation over outcomes create incentives for cadres to invest in 'trace-leaving' rather than substantive work, and headquarters organs that inspect by reviewing materials actively reproduce the behavior they are meant to correct. The three-measure reform described here fits a recurring pattern in PLA political work literature where individual units announce local procedural fixes to formalism—fixes the institution has been announcing, in various forms, for decades—raising the question of whether political rectification training has the structural authority to change the incentive architecture that generates the problem in the first place.

Machine-generated from the original text, and distinct from the machine translation of the title. Not reviewed by a human. It is a reading of what was published, not a verification of it.

What this record supports

Source record This item was published at the URL above on the date the source stated.
Official claim Its contents are that institution's assertions.

It does not establish that the described events occurred, that any capability exists, or that the institution's stated position is its actual policy.

Cite this record

Two separate claims, cited separately: the item as its publisher issued it, and the record as this corpus holds it.

Source text. CMC Political Work Department. "我眼中的政治整训丨让政绩观从“看痕迹”回归“看实绩”." PLA Daily (解放军报), 2026-06-02. http://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16464988.html.

As held. Indo-Pacific Record, China Desk Corpus, Record 966, Snapshot — 2026-08-26 (3,574 records).

Processing note. The English title and summary held for this record are machine-generated and have not been reviewed by a human.

The record number and this record path are locators inside the 2026-08-26 snapshot. Neither is a DOI, accession number, permanent identifier, public permalink, or published route. See identifiers and citation guidance.