Source record CMC Political Work Department · 2026-05-09

Law and Discipline Online | Classification Cannot Be Done 'Off the Top of One's Head'

法纪在线丨定密不能“想当然”

Machine translation The heading is a machine translation of the original title above. Not reviewed by a human.

Processing status

Analyzed

Passed relevance screening and completed analysis. English title and summary are machine-generated.

Machine assessment Not flagged for closer review. This is a software triage result, not an editorial judgment.

Provenance

What is known about this record and where each part came from.
Desk	China Desk
Publishing institution	CMC Political Work Department
Source outlet	PLA Daily (解放军报) (pla_daily)
Source language	zh-Hans — an attribute of the source, not of this record
Source-stated publication date	2026-05-09
Original URL	http://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16459483.html
Collected at	2026-05-09 03:24:57 — collection metadata, not a publication time
Content fingerprint	bc7d1b9877fbdb03867ab862f51584b13c00c3ca3c0355270220733f3bd64fca — taken when the record was captured, over the stored original title and text
Collection run	10
Analysis model	claude-sonnet-4-6
Prompt version	v1

Every field above is defined in the data dictionary — what it means, when it may be absent, and where it stops being reliable.

Stored source text

Text captured from the source page. Extraction may omit material or include unrelated page elements; consult the original URL when exact wording or completeness matters.

定密不能“想当然” ■李元飞 “张干事，这份文件标注的密级不符合涉密事项认定标准，请按照保密规定重新定密。”前不久，某部保密员小李拿着刚流转来的文电审批件，来到机关某股。接到反馈意见，该股张干事有些委屈：“这份文件内容包含单位和官兵的敏感信息，我把密级定高一点，也是为了引起大家重视，防止工作中不注意造成信息泄露。” “谨慎负责不是随意提高文件密级的理由，相关法规明确，军队涉密文件的密级判定有着严格的范围、权限和流程，必须对照规定精准核定。”结合前期通报的定密违规典型案例，小李给张干事算了“低密高定”的几本账，“第一是安全账，随意扩大定密范围，会让真正需要重点防护的核心涉密信息被稀释，反而削弱了核心涉密内容的防护力度；第二是效能账，随意提高文件密级，让非涉密文件按涉密文件全流程管理，不仅大幅增加秘密文件管理成本，还会拖慢正常业务办理效率，甚至影响官兵的切身利益；第三是法纪账，不按法定标准定密，本身就是违反保密法规的行为，一旦造成不良后果，必须承担相应的纪律和法律责任。” 一句句法规解读，一条条危害剖析，让张干事低头脸红，意识到了问题所在。他当即撤回了错标密级的文件，仔细学习文件定密规定后，重新标注密级。事后，张干事主动在机关交班会上作了检讨，用自己的亲身经历警示大家，定密工作不能“想当然”，更不能凭主观判断随意定。该部党委了解情况后高度重视，明确保密工作必须全程规范。随后，他们在各级开展保密工作专项培训和排查整治，认真纠治保密工作主观随意等问题。 “以前只知道保密工作重要，但是实际办理业务时，难免会有疏忽。培训中，我不仅明晰了保密纪律规定，也学习到了不少保密工作的经验做法。”该部一名保密员告诉笔者，为进一步提升相关人员保密能力，该部组织全体机关干部、保密骨干系统学习保密法律法规，还邀请上级保密部门开展专题授课，针对保密工作人员专门设置岗位培训考核，规定考核不合格者一律不得承办文电业务。如今，张干事成为了保密工作的明白人，每次承办文电，桌上总会摆着涉密事项清单，遇到拿不准的内容第一时间向保密部门咨询。他深有感触地说：“保密无小事，只有严格依规，才能真正筑牢部队保密安全的坚固防线。”

Summary

Machine summary

A PLA headquarters unit's secrecy officer corrected a staff officer who had arbitrarily over-classified a document, triggering a unit Party committee response that included mandatory secrecy training, inspection-and-rectification campaigns, and an assessment regime barring personnel who fail from handling documents or communications. The article is a compliance-education piece published in a PLA outlet and follows a standard pattern of using individual disciplinary cases to reinforce secrecy regulations; it contains no new information about PLA classification policy but illustrates the institutional mechanisms—Party committee oversight, superior secrecy department lectures, and pass/fail assessments—through which the PLA enforces document-handling standards at the unit level.

Machine-generated from the original text, and distinct from the machine translation of the title. Not reviewed by a human. It is a reading of what was published, not a verification of it.

What this record supports

Source record This item was published at the URL above on the date the source stated.
Official claim Its contents are that institution's assertions.

It does not establish that the described events occurred, that any capability exists, or that the institution's stated position is its actual policy.

Cite this record

Two separate claims, cited separately: the item as its publisher issued it, and the record as this corpus holds it.

Source text. CMC Political Work Department. "法纪在线丨定密不能“想当然”." PLA Daily (解放军报), 2026-05-09. http://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16459483.html.

As held. Indo-Pacific Record, China Desk Corpus, Record 75, Snapshot — 2026-08-26 (3,574 records).

Processing note. The English title and summary held for this record are machine-generated and have not been reviewed by a human.

The record number and this record path are locators inside the 2026-08-26 snapshot. Neither is a DOI, accession number, permanent identifier, public permalink, or published route. See identifiers and citation guidance.