A Navy Unit Conducts Its Quarterly Survey of Officers' and Soldiers' Thinking — Why Did Everyone Choose "C"?
Source-stated date: · PLA Daily (解放军报)
海军某部开展季度官兵思想调查,问卷为啥都选“C”?
Record history
- Published12 October 2026, by CMC Political Work Department
- Collected2026-10-12 21:47:30 UTC, run 167
- Machine readingAnalyzed
- AnalysisNot in a published issue's source trail
Summary
Machine summaryA Southern Theater Command Navy unit's headquarters discovered that officers and soldiers were systematically selecting 'C' (very satisfied) on quarterly ideological-trend surveys without reading the questions, prompting Staff Officer Li to combine questionnaire data with embedded squad-level conversations and 'venting sessions' (吐槽会) before reporting the dysfunction upward rather than filing routine statistics. The article documents a specific failure mode in political work (政治工作): feedback loops that never close erode grassroots willingness to report honestly, producing ideological data the headquarters cannot trust. The fix the unit adopted — online reporting via the Qiangjun Network, categorized problem tracking, and visible follow-through on issues like dependent medical coverage and school transport — is framed as a product of the unit's ongoing political rectification training (政治整训) targeting formalism (形式主义), making this a case study in how that campaign is being applied to internal survey methodology rather than evidence of a broader posture change.
Stored source text
Source record调查问卷为啥都选“C” ——南部战区海军某部机关改进调研作风的一段经历 ■刘博宇 解放军报记者 陈晓杰 那一次,南部战区海军某部开展季度官兵思想调查,让该部李干事陷入深思——官兵提交问卷速度很快,可统计结果一出来,他却犯了嘀咕:“怎么都选的‘C’(非常满意)?” “选‘C’的官兵多,说明单位官兵思想状况稳定。”同事劝李干事别想多了,可他还是忍不住琢磨:这结果真能如实反映官兵思想底数吗? “别看了,都选‘C’准没错。”填问卷时,几名官兵的窃窃私语,让李干事印象深刻。利用昼检夜查的时机,他结合问卷内容,与不同单位官兵谈心交流。 深入了解后,他发现官兵真实思想状态,并非一个“C”选项就能概括。 “其实,填问卷时后面的题目我都没读”“我都忘记调查问卷啥内容了”……李干事了解到,个别战士觉得,每次填问卷,内容、选项都差不多,选“C”最省事,吐露真实心声不仅显得不合群,说不定还会给自己带来麻烦;还有战士反映,部分问卷题目答案选项较为单一,无法从选项中找到最能表达自己想法的答案,只能笼统地都选“C”。 机关以往也会做一些思想调查,李干事对问卷结果没太往心里去,只是机械做好统计上报的工作。今年以来,该部持续开展政治整训,重点纠治重程序轻实效、查改脱节等形式主义问题,深入推进思想清理、作风整治,全面整改机关干部思想麻痹、作风不实等突出问题。 这让李干事沉下心来,对手头工作进行审视反思。 “一项工作干久了,容易产生惯性和思想麻痹。”这次,李干事没有简单按惯例上报问卷结果,而是在交班会上汇报了调研发现的问题。 思想动态调查问卷,是感知兵心、掌握实情的重要窗口,决不能流于形式、走了过场。该部领导研究认为,思想调查不被基层官兵重视,表面上看是问卷调查内容不够贴合官兵实际,部分题目、选项设置笼统;深层次看,是因为个别干部以往工作重程序轻实效,问题反馈未形成闭环,挫伤了官兵敞开心扉讲真话、说实情的积极性。 提高政治工作质效,必先把准官兵思想脉搏。该部党委决定,仍由李干事牵头,从优化思想调查问卷题库、创新调研方式、强化结果运用等方面入手,推动思想调查落细落实。 这次,李干事开始下功夫收集官兵对于问卷形式、问卷内容的意见建议,将问卷问题和选项内容进一步细化—— 调研方式上,采取“线上+线下”“集中+分散”相结合的形式。线上依托强军网开设留言板等,官兵可随时反映问题;线下鼓励机关干部深入班排蹲点,通过“拉家常”“吐槽会”等形式,在聊天中了解官兵真实想法。 对调研结果,实行“问题收集、分类处理、反馈跟踪”闭环机制,机关及时梳理汇总,明确责任部门和解决时限,处理结果通过营区公示栏、电子屏等渠道及时向官兵反馈。 再次开展问卷调查,基层官兵发现问卷更接地气、问题更有针对性、选项更多更细。大家不再简单选“C”,而是认真思考、如实填写,问卷上出现了更多个性化答案和具体建议。 最近,针对个别舰艇官兵反映的“军属医疗保障”“孩子上学接送距离较远”等问题,李干事及时将官兵问卷反映的思想动向和具体意见建议汇总提交。相关部门很快依据相关规定,安排了军属医疗保障政策宣讲,同时调派车辆,实现营区学生集体接送。
Processing status
Analyzed
Passed relevance screening and completed analysis. English title and summary are machine-generated.
Provenance
| Desk | China Desk |
|---|---|
| Publishing institution | CMC Political Work Department |
| Source outlet | PLA Daily (解放军报) |
| Source language | zh-Hans |
| Source-stated publication date | 2026-10-12 |
| Original URL | http://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16492214.html |
| Collected at | 2026-10-12 21:47:30 |
| Content fingerprint | 26cdf14f31f13f16fa2a126d02b6c645b1d4467eb1c72cc1ffdab023a1291c58 |
| Collection run | 167 |
| Analysis model | claude-sonnet-4-6 |
| Prompt version | v1 |
What this record supports
- Source record This item was published at the URL above on the date the source stated.
- Official claim Its contents are that institution's assertions.
It does not establish that the described events occurred, that any capability exists, or that the institution's stated position is its actual policy.
Cite this record
Source text. CMC Political Work Department. "海军某部开展季度官兵思想调查,问卷为啥都选“C”?." PLA Daily (解放军报), 2026-10-12. http://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16492214.html.
As held. Indo-Pacific Record, Research Atlas corpus, Record 5132, Snapshot — 2026-10-15 (873 records).