既应看课讲得如何,又应看身教作用发挥得如何
Processing status
Not selected for analysis
Screened and not selected for analysis. The original record is stored; no translation or summary was produced.
Provenance
| Desk | China Desk |
|---|---|
| Publishing institution | CMC Political Work Department |
| Source outlet | PLA Daily (解放军报) |
| Source language | zh-Hans |
| Source-stated publication date | 2026-09-08 |
| Original URL | http://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16484300.html |
| Collected at | 2026-09-08 16:58:25 |
| Content fingerprint | b3009cd5361a25e66532b11fe989390f8d997484b735f836cecc6cd7fc800b1b |
| Collection run | 133 |
Stored source text
“身教好”成为硬杠杠 ■金鑫 某部在评选优秀政治教员时,不仅坚持课讲得好这一标准,还注重考量授课人的官德人品,充分尊重官兵对政治教员的公论。这种把评课与评人结合起来的做法,符合“身教重于言传”的理念,值得学习借鉴。 《军队基层建设纲要》明确,政治教员应当“会知兵、会施教、会谈心、身教好”,其中“一好”是“三会”的基础和保证。“最美新时代革命军人”王晓明就是一位优秀政治教员,不仅课讲得好,还扎根基层、热爱基层,身先士卒、以身作则,立起了政治干部的好样子。这启示我们,施教者知行合一、心口如一,受教者才会紧紧跟随、向上向好。 人不率则不从,身不先则不信。事实上,官兵评判政治教员,总是听其言、观其行,然后信其理、服其教。对政治教员来说,身教若不立,言教难彰显。现实生活中,为什么一些政治教员讲的是“真理”,官兵却没有入脑入心,就在于教育者在对己和对人上存在“双重标准”。 罗荣桓同志说过:“不要只是以口号去要求别人,那样只会使自己脱离群众,使自己成为一个空头革命家,而应该以实际行动去影响别人。”各级在评选优秀政治教员时,既应看课讲得如何,又应看身教作用发挥得如何,切实选出过得硬、信得过的好教员,影响和带动广大官兵树形象、干事业、谋打赢。
What this record supports
- Source record This item was published at the URL above on the date the source stated.
- Official claim Its contents are that institution's assertions.
It does not establish that the described events occurred, that any capability exists, or that the institution's stated position is its actual policy.
Cite this record
Source text. CMC Political Work Department. "既应看课讲得如何,又应看身教作用发挥得如何." PLA Daily (解放军报), 2026-09-08. http://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16484300.html.
As held. Indo-Pacific Record, China Desk Corpus, Record 3980, Snapshot — 2026-09-08 (3,975 records).