Seizing the Initiative in Converting "Exhaustion" and "Rest" — The Military Wisdom of the Battle of Pingyu
把“劳”“逸”转换主动权抓在手中——平舆之战的军事智慧
Processing status
Analyzed
Passed relevance screening and completed analysis. English title and summary are machine-generated.
Provenance
| Desk | China Desk |
|---|---|
| Publishing institution | CMC Political Work Department |
| Source outlet | PLA Daily (解放军报) |
| Source language | zh-Hans |
| Source-stated publication date | 2026-09-08 |
| Original URL | http://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16484286.html |
| Collected at | 2026-09-08 16:58:25 |
| Content fingerprint | 5e6ece01815537226380a0055cf715fcae8798449b0de89a7441c73aede604c7 |
| Collection run | 133 |
| Analysis model | claude-sonnet-4-6 |
| Prompt version | v1 |
Stored source text
战国晚期,秦国历经多年经营,综合国力遥遥领先。楚国作为南方疆域辽阔的大国,是秦国完成统一道路上的强大对手。公元前225年,秦王嬴政决意伐楚。在战争初期,嬴政轻信将领李信的判断,以二十万兵力大举东进,楚军抓住秦军轻敌冒进的漏洞,大破秦军。战败之后,嬴政重新启用老将王翦,举全国兵力开启第二次伐楚作战。秦楚两军主力在平舆形成大规模对峙,一场决定两国国运的决战就此拉开帷幕。 在战争实践中,以逸待劳大多属于防御方的作战谋略,即防御方依托工事、地利等优势养精蓄锐,等待远道而来的敌军疲惫之后再伺机出击。平舆之战却并非如此,进攻方秦军反而以逸待劳。王翦率领秦军深入楚国腹地,在进攻状态下主动营造“逸”的条件,迫使楚军陷入被动求战、不断消耗的“劳”态。这一战例生动地表明,进攻方也能够通过顶层设计和战术安排,掌握“劳”“逸”转换的主动权。当前,信息化智能化战争加速演进,战场节奏空前加快,“劳”与“逸”、调动与反调动的界限不断模糊。我们可以汲取平舆之战中秦军的军事智慧,不断深化对“劳”与“逸”的认识,进一步拓宽思维,助力战术战法创新。 积极塑造态势,消耗对手战争潜力。在平舆之战中,王翦率领秦军挺进楚境。以常理度之,秦军深入敌国腹地,应该寻求速胜之道,避免陷入持久战的泥潭。但王翦抵达战场后却一反常态,没有立刻主动发起进攻,而是下令全军完善防御工事。同时每日休整操练、改善伙食,养足士兵体力。随着时间的推移,楚军数次求战而不得,大军长期驻扎,庞大军队的消耗不断透支楚国的国力储备和战争潜力。此时,“劳”与“逸”的形势开始发生逆转,胜利的天平逐渐向秦军一侧倾斜。秦军之所以能取得这样的作战效果,一方面在于秦国雄厚的国力支撑,另一方面在于利用了楚国急于求胜的焦躁心理,以静制动、以逸待劳,在战争潜力的此消彼长中进一步扩大了优势。虽然在信息化智能化战争中,各类感知、打击手段层出不穷,很难再依靠单纯的阵地固守实现“劳”“逸”转换,但进攻方依然可以结合自身实力与敌方特点,处理好“静”与“动”、“耗”与“打”的辩证关系,通过积极塑造态势,逼迫敌方持续投入资源,增加对手的战争成本,进而实现耗敌于无形、击敌于猝然。 保持战略定力,主动设计战场规则。在伐楚之战初期,李信之所以惨败,一个重要原因就是追求快速攻城略地,部队长途奔袭后精疲力竭,被楚军以逸待劳,最后损兵折将。在当时的作战环境下,王翦如果不能保持战略定力,也极易重蹈李信的覆辙。具体而言,王翦手握秦国几乎全部的作战力量,朝堂之上对其的警惕、猜忌、顾虑之声不绝于耳,普遍希望他速战、速胜、速归。同时,楚军又不断到阵前挑衅,坚守不出就可能影响军心士气。面对内外部的双重压力,王翦保持了清醒的战略认知,不为“喧嚣”所裹挟、不因挑衅而动摇,始终按照自己的谋划设计战场。漫长的对峙过后,原本以逸待劳的楚军人困马乏,远道而来的秦军却养足了精神。就在楚军拔营转移、阵型散乱的时候,王翦敏锐捕捉到战机,号令全军出击,一举击溃楚军。同样,在信息化智能化战争中,“劳”与“逸”的博弈不仅仅在于士兵身心的疲劳程度,更在于能否有效主导战局走向,守住有利于自身的作战周期。在有利条件没有达成之前,必须保持足够的战略定力,从而确保战场规则由我主导、战局走向于我有利。 做好战力维护,不断提高作战效能。在两军对峙的过程中,王翦深知,大军久驻异国,很容易滋生懈怠思乡、军心涣散等问题,如果训练松弛、管理不力,即便不交战,战斗力也会持续下滑,所谓的“逸”就会沦为怠惰废弛。因此,他要求士兵坚持常态化训练,保证作战技能不退化;后勤全力保障物资供给,让部队得到充分休整。同时,王翦时常巡视营地,掌握训练水平与士兵身心状态,确保全军精力充沛、士气高昂。得益于这样的举措,秦军在长期对峙中战斗力不降反升,始终维持精锐水准,具备决战一击制胜的硬实力。反观楚军,军队久屯却无仗可打,又没有长期、科学的管理制度,士气日渐消磨,陷入“劳身”“劳神”的不利局面,战斗力大打折扣。在现代战争中,同样要清醒认识到,进攻方的“逸”不是无所事事的静止,而是积极主动的战力维护,“劳”“逸”对比是双向的,既要尽力增加敌方消耗,更要防范己方在待机阶段出现战斗力滑坡。对此,必须常态化组织实战化训练,稳固人员战斗素养。同时,抓好组织管理与思想疏导,缓释倦怠和心理压力,做到休整不松懈、待机不废训,确保作战能力不断提高。 洞察对手短板,择机完成状态切换。王翦的过人之处,不仅在于待机蛰伏,更在于全程不间断侦察监控楚军动向,实时评估“劳”“逸”博弈进度。在这个过程中,秦军持续搜集情报,研判楚军士气、粮草储备、兵力调动等情况,以此判断敌方消耗何时抵达临界点。若是过早开战,楚军阵容完整、精力充足,很难取得决定性战果;出击过晚,楚军完成重新部署,又会重回对峙僵局。正是基于这样的判断,王翦选择在楚军处于队列分散、警戒降低、作战体系短暂失衡的行军途中果断出击,取得了理想的战果。在攻防节奏不断加快的现代战争中,不存在永久固定的“劳”“逸”格局,“劳”“逸”状态始终处于动态变化中。不能有效识别、捕捉战机,再显著的优势也无法转化成实际战果。这就决定了,现代进攻作战需要构建多维度情报感知体系,不间断跟踪敌方后勤补给、兵力部署、人员状态、指挥运行等关键要素,综合评估敌方消耗程度,精准识别“劳”“逸”转换临界点,一旦发现敌方出现破绽,就能迅速完成力量聚合,把前期积累的战略优势转化为作战实效。
Summary
Machine summary
A PLA military theory article in official media uses the 225 BCE Battle of Pingyu — in which Qin general Wang Jian refused battle against Chu, deliberately exhausted a larger enemy force, then struck during its withdrawal — to derive four operational principles for informatized and intelligentized warfare (信息化智能化战争): active situation-shaping to attrit enemy war potential, maintaining strategic resolve (战略定力) against internal and external pressure, sustaining combat readiness through realistic combat training (实战化训练) during standoffs, and building a multi-dimensional intelligence and sensing system (多维度情报感知体系) to identify the precise moment for transition from defense to strike. The article fits a recurring PLA genre that launders contemporary operational concepts through classical Chinese military history, here extending the traditional 以逸待劳 ('awaiting the exhausted enemy from a position of rest') framework to argue that the attacking side — not only the defender — can engineer favorable exhaustion-rest dynamics, a framing that maps directly onto PLA thinking about how to manage a protracted high-intensity campaign against a technologically capable adversary.
What this record supports
- Source record This item was published at the URL above on the date the source stated.
- Official claim Its contents are that institution's assertions.
It does not establish that the described events occurred, that any capability exists, or that the institution's stated position is its actual policy.
Cite this record
Source text. CMC Political Work Department. "把“劳”“逸”转换主动权抓在手中——平舆之战的军事智慧." PLA Daily (解放军报), 2026-09-08. http://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16484286.html.
As held. Indo-Pacific Record, China Desk Corpus, Record 3959, Snapshot — 2026-09-08 (3,975 records).