Why Did a Competition Champion Voluntarily Switch "Tracks"?
比武冠军为何主动更换“赛道”
Processing status
Analyzed
Passed relevance screening and completed analysis. English title and summary are machine-generated.
Provenance
| Desk | China Desk |
|---|---|
| Publishing institution | CMC Political Work Department |
| Source outlet | PLA Daily (解放军报) |
| Source language | zh-Hans |
| Source-stated publication date | 2026-08-05 |
| Original URL | http://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16477780.html |
| Collected at | 2026-08-05 14:44:48 |
| Content fingerprint | 20aea2411c3bdc0f8d53680d041e9401cba411377df9f285c3a25560e7618b51 |
| Collection run | 103 |
| Analysis model | claude-sonnet-4-6 |
| Prompt version | v1 |
Stored source text
比武冠军为何主动更换“赛道” ■闫 涛 乔腾铎 延振宇+AI绘 那一次,第82集团军某旅年度无人机专业比武落下帷幕,上次屈居第二的二级上士鞠树森一鼓作气拿下第一。 走下赛场,他却有些高兴不起来,因为这场比赛少了他的老对手——上一次的冠军何青龙。 何班长是该旅无人机侦察分队一名中士,擅长无人机操作。在上次专业比武中,他力压鞠树森拔得头筹。 这次比武前,鞠树森做了大量功课。他找到去年比武的录像反复回放,琢磨操作要领,修正改进存在的不足,还常当面向何班长请教,就盼着在这次比武中一决高下。 谁知,何班长没给他这个机会。今年,他果断决定,换一个“赛道”——告别以往单纯比拼技能的比武擂台,扎进实战化练兵难题里,专攻训法优化、战法创新。 问及原因,何班长谈起之前一次印象深刻的失利。 那次无人机演练中,导调组紧贴实战环境,增设了多频段电磁干扰、未知特情袭扰等课目。何班长曾在比武中遇到过类似问题,就娴熟运用日常训练的技巧来处置。 可没想到,方法并未奏效,因为演习场的环境较比武场更为复杂,周边的树林、山石和各种复杂电磁干扰,严重影响无人机通信,这些情况超出了他的预料。 最终,何班长只得请来教员,借助设备才解决了问题。 演练结束,何班长深刻反思,意识到自己陷入了“比武思维”定式,专注打磨比武技巧,却对复杂战场可能出现的险难情况缺乏应有的认知和能力准备。虽能够考场拿高分,却少了战场能应变的真功夫。 看清短板后,何班长主动将重心从“赛场争冠”转向“战场研战”。他利用驻训演习、兵棋推演等时机,认真研练战术,摸索山地机动、隐蔽侦察、特情处置等实战场景下的应对招法,结合连队战术综合演练、背靠背对抗演习查漏补缺、优化改良。 得知何班长换“赛道”的经历,鞠树森心生佩服,他暗下决心,要向何班长学习,放下对奖牌的执念、苦练实战硬功。 这些问题,该连杜连长也留意到了。他发现一些比武尖子在实战中确实存在“水土不服”的问题:三级军士长吕班长曾在战区无人机集训比武中取得第二名的好成绩,却在实战演练中掌握不好无人机射击;中士小尚参加集团军比武跻身前三,但在实战演练中出现无人机失联现象…… “比武只是练兵的手段,打赢才是练兵的终极目标。咱们追求的是战场上的打赢,而不只是考核中的名次。”党支部研究后,开始主动作出引导。 他们尝试调整练兵模式:设置典型作战场景,设全战术战法研训课目,深入开展多机协同、极限飞行、抗干扰飞行等实操运用;组织编配论证,立足任务实际灵活编组人员,使指挥协同更顺畅;组建“无人机专修室”,吸引更多官兵加入自主创新队伍。 靶心牢牢瞄在实战上,一段时间后,连队几名比武尖子的能力素质有了显著变化:何班长能从容应对复杂环境下的无人机侦察搜索任务;吕班长在无人机研究改进方面进步明显;小尚的无人机故障维修水平突飞猛进……中士王一凡感慨,现在大家关注的,不再是谁的奖牌拿得多,而是看谁在演训中又破解了新难题。 杜连长欣慰地告诉笔者,如今,以赛促训、以训备战的理念已经深入人心,连队官兵瞄着实战参训热情持续高涨,不少新训法也应运而生,探索形成的“多旋翼无人机挂载轻武器精准射击系统”“无人机精准投掷手雷”等多项成果在集团军得到推广运用。
Summary
Machine summary
He Qinglong, a sergeant in the UAV reconnaissance detachment of a brigade under the 82nd Group Army, voluntarily withdrew from the unit's annual UAV specialty competition to focus on developing combat-realistic training methods (训法) and tactics (战法), after a brigade exercise exposed that his competition-honed techniques failed under multi-band electromagnetic jamming and complex terrain. The article documents a specific institutional problem the PLA has named explicitly — 比武思维, or "competition thinking" — in which soldiers optimize for scored evaluations rather than battlefield adaptability, a gap that showed up concretely when decorated UAV operators could not manage gunnery control or signal loss in combat exercises. The brigade's corrective measures — scenario-based tactical research subjects, multi-UAV coordination drills, and a dedicated UAV workshop — produced transferable results, with a "multi-rotor UAV-mounted light weapons precision fire system" and "UAV precision grenade delivery" method now promoted across the group army.
What this record supports
- Source record This item was published at the URL above on the date the source stated.
- Official claim Its contents are that institution's assertions.
It does not establish that the described events occurred, that any capability exists, or that the institution's stated position is its actual policy.
Cite this record
Source text. CMC Political Work Department. "比武冠军为何主动更换“赛道”." PLA Daily (解放军报), 2026-08-05. http://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16477780.html.
As held. Indo-Pacific Record, China Desk Corpus, Record 2933, Snapshot — 2026-08-26 (3,574 records).