Indo-Pacific Record

Official defense and security texts, preserved as published and analyzed in context.

Collection is current; analysis is behind it. Records dated after 2026-08-24 are stored and awaiting screening. What these dates mean.

← Corpus by week

Source record CMC Political Work Department · 2026-07-29

@带兵人,多听听大家怎么看

Processing status

Not selected for analysis

Screened and not selected for analysis. The original record is stored; no translation or summary was produced.

Provenance

What is known about this record and where each part came from.
DeskChina Desk
Publishing institutionCMC Political Work Department
Source outletPLA Daily (解放军报) (pla_daily)
Source languagezh-Hans — an attribute of the source, not of this record
Source-stated publication date2026-07-29
Original URLhttp://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16476454.html
Collected at2026-07-29 14:39:09 — collection metadata, not a publication time
Content fingerprintcefe4b9c4bdc494ca95b3a1a799717b0b415b4b3f6b03564364bfc34136e5fc6 — taken when the record was captured, over the stored original title and text
Collection run95

Every field above is defined in the data dictionary — what it means, when it may be absent, and where it stops being reliable.

Stored source text

Text captured from the source page. Extraction may omit material or include unrelated page elements; consult the original URL when exact wording or completeness matters.

“这次比武能夺冠,朱班长提出的‘分模块训练法’功不可没!”总结会上,我热情地为二班班长朱亚信点赞。看到如今全排团结一致,我感到很欣慰。然而,就在几个月前,排里还是另外一种氛围。 当时,我初任排长,便跟着连队参加上级组织的演练。我们排的任务是夺占某高地。为圆满完成任务,行动前,我带着骨干反复研究作战方案。 “步兵在坦克后跟进,保持步坦协同节奏,配合工兵分队清除障碍,而后向‘敌’阵地快速推进。”充分研判战场环境后,我定下全排的基本战法。 “排长,任务区域地形起伏较大,保持您说的距离会影响步坦协同的灵活性,建议缩小一半。” 对于王瑞斌的“异议”,我不以为然。一方面,是因为我在院校系统学习过相关课程,理论基础扎实,且经过几次推演,对自己的方案非常自信;另一方面,则是觉得自己身为指挥员的“专业权威”受到了挑战,不愿自我否定,当众丢面子。所以,我以教材上就是这么写的,数据也都验证过为由,否定了王瑞斌的建议。 见我坚持己见,王瑞斌欲言又止。当我就战斗协同、作战保障、指挥通联等方面征求意见时,再无人发言。 自认为方案完美无瑕,我立即组织全排进行模拟训练。然而训练结果却出乎意料。因地形复杂,步兵班组始终无法与坦克保持有效协同,战术配合显得十分笨拙。 训练间隙,我无意间听到两个战士小声嘀咕:“王班长意见是对的,把距离拉近点才能有效协同……” 晚上,我回去翻看教材,赫然发现上面写着:“步坦协同距离需根据地形灵活调整,通常在以下的区间……” 这句话无异于“当头棒喝”。我不只记错了教材,还自以为是,否决了合理建议。回想起会上的鸦雀无声,我不禁脸上发烫。 次日一早,我集合全排,向大家坦陈错误:“昨天训练出现的问题,责任在我。教材上规定的距离是参考值,我却把它当成了死规定。”随后,结合王瑞斌等几个老班长的建议,排里根据任务区域地形特点,灵活调整了步坦协同距离,提升了训练协同效率,最终在演练中顺利完成既定任务,得到上级肯定。 如今,“大家怎么看”成了我的口头禅。无论是训练还是工作,我都会充分听取大家的意见,结合实际情况进行调整优化。在大家的共同努力下,全排工作积极性持续高涨,建设水平也稳步提高。 这段经历让我明白,带兵人的威信,从来不是职务带来的。敢于承认“我不懂”“我错了”,展现求真务实的作风和尊重专业的态度,也是带兵人不可或缺的素质。当我们愿意承认自己的局限,真诚向战士学习时,收获的不仅是更好的训练成效,更是官兵之间坚不可摧的信任。

What this record supports

It does not establish that the described events occurred, that any capability exists, or that the institution's stated position is its actual policy.

Cite this record

Two separate claims, cited separately: the item as its publisher issued it, and the record as this corpus holds it.

Source text. CMC Political Work Department. "@带兵人,多听听大家怎么看." PLA Daily (解放军报), 2026-07-29. http://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16476454.html.

As held. Indo-Pacific Record, China Desk Corpus, Record 2723, Snapshot — 2026-08-26 (3,574 records).

Processing note. This record was screened and not selected for analysis. No translation and no summary were produced.

The record number and this record path are locators inside the 2026-08-26 snapshot. Neither is a DOI, accession number, permanent identifier, public permalink, or published route. See identifiers and citation guidance.