Conduct Thorough Exercise and Training After-Action Reviews — Never Go to the Battlefield Still Carrying Problems
做好演训复盘,决不带着问题上战场
Processing status
Analyzed
Passed relevance screening and completed analysis. English title and summary are machine-generated.
Provenance
| Desk | China Desk |
|---|---|
| Publishing institution | CMC Political Work Department |
| Source outlet | PLA Daily (解放军报) |
| Source language | zh-Hans |
| Source-stated publication date | 2026-06-18 |
| Original URL | http://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16468127.html |
| Collected at | 2026-06-18 16:09:40 |
| Content fingerprint | abe60f62120fe2a258947396a0d15f475931f51d336236f492076dc553bee965 |
| Collection run | 61 |
| Analysis model | claude-sonnet-4-6 |
| Prompt version | v1 |
Stored source text
近年来,全军各级组织的军事演训频度越来越高、强度越来越大,而且也更重视硝烟散去之后的复盘总结。通过复盘,可以深入知悉对手、做到知己知彼,可以弄清诸多制胜因素、优化选择路径;同时也可以知道“陷阱”在哪里、避免重犯错误,知道“短板”在何处、更好地扬长补短。然而从现实情况看,个别单位的复盘总结在成功经验列了几大条、矛盾问题找了一大堆之后就收尾打结,至于问题如何整改、何时整改则用力不够,结果“昨天的问题”今天依然如故,“去年的问题”今年仍然存在,最终留下隐患。 历史上这方面的教训有不少。二战爆发前夕,法国一位名叫普雷塔拉的将军率部参加一次重要演习。演习探讨的问题是未来德军会不会从阿登山区进攻法国,进而让人们寄予厚望的马奇诺防线丧失作用。结果,普雷塔拉指挥的装甲师及步兵师数万人,成功突破法军在该地区的防守,用事实证明这一假设具有真实的可能性。可惜的是,法军一些高级将领事后认为这只是巧合,并未加以重视,更不用说采取防范措施了。而1940年5月导致法国投降的德军入侵,恰似当年普雷塔拉演习的翻版。这种在枪响之前,根本不把问题当问题、更不用说解决问题的惨痛教训,着实让人警醒。 战争,从某种意义上讲就是一门“钻空子”的哲学,对手一旦发现你有缝隙、有漏洞、有弱处可钻,就会抓住机会给你致命一击。而诸如这些漏洞、弱处等问题,既有战局变化随之出现的,更有平时演训关注不够、解决不力留下的。军事演训作为战争的预实践,只要真抓实抗、真枪实弹,必然会遇到种种难以意料、超乎想象的问题,关键是如何看、怎么办。 有人说“存在问题并不可怕”,但在你死我活的战场上,存在问题不是不可怕,而是极其可怕,它往往会让官兵付出鲜血甚至生命的代价;演训暴露出问题并不可怕,可怕的是把问题束之高阁直至带着问题上战场,在对手残酷无情的打击中才追悔莫及。 兵战之道,自古有训。墨菲定律告诫我们,战争中一切可能发生的事情,迟早都会发生,越坏的情况越有可能发生,不管它听起来多么不可思议。生死之地有真理,战争最有发言权。对一支富有忧患意识的军队来讲,演训既是为了证明“我很行”,也要反思“我哪里不行”,平时演训发现的问题越多、越深刻,说明演训及复盘越有效,而演训之后解决问题越早、越彻底,对未来打仗就越有利。 当年,国学大师王国维曾提出过著名的“人生三境界”。演训虽然有别于人生,但也有相同之处。探究来看,演训中的问题虽然各具情态,但整改起来也应区分“三个层级”:第一层,就问题改问题。急则治其标,缓则治其本。推进练兵备战时间不等人、问题不等人,如果不从一个个具体问题抓起、改起,必然会积重难返、无力回天。第二层,就问题改思维。世上一切问题从源头讲都是思维的问题。如果思维观念不合乎战争潮流,就会对问题苗头作出错误的反应,就会被问题牵着鼻子走。第三层,就问题改机制。制度机制带有根本性、稳定性、长期性。演训中的老大难问题之所以久拖不决,既有难度大的客观原因,更与督导激励不够、定责问责不力等息息相关。实践证明,从这“三个层级”入手,坚持把“主动性”与“强制性”、“当下改”与“长久立”有机结合起来,同时发力、综合用力,定能做实做好演训复盘之后问题整改这篇大文章。
Summary
Machine summary
A PLA commentary published in military media argues that units across the force are failing to close the loop on after-action reviews — identifying problems during exercises but not tracking or enforcing their resolution, leaving the same deficiencies unaddressed year over year. The piece documents a recognized institutional dysfunction in the PLA's training system: the gap between problem identification and problem correction, which the author frames as a direct combat-readiness liability and illustrates with the 1940 French collapse through the Ardennes as a cautionary case. The proposed three-tier remediation framework — fix the specific problem, reform the underlying thinking, then reform the supervising mechanism — confirms that the PLA views this as a systemic accountability failure requiring structural fixes, not merely a matter of individual unit discipline.
What this record supports
- Source record This item was published at the URL above on the date the source stated.
- Official claim Its contents are that institution's assertions.
It does not establish that the described events occurred, that any capability exists, or that the institution's stated position is its actual policy.
Cite this record
Source text. CMC Political Work Department. "做好演训复盘,决不带着问题上战场." PLA Daily (解放军报), 2026-06-18. http://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16468127.html.
As held. Indo-Pacific Record, China Desk Corpus, Record 1539, Snapshot — 2026-08-26 (3,574 records).