Indo-Pacific Record

Official defense and security texts, preserved as published and analyzed in context.

Collection is current; analysis is behind it. Records dated after 2026-08-24 are stored and awaiting screening. What these dates mean.

← Corpus by week

Source record CMC Political Work Department · 2026-06-16

From 'Each Fighting His Own Battle' to 'Covering for Each Other': The Principal and Deputy Party Secretaries Take the Lead in Emphasizing Unity and Keeping the Big Picture in Mind

从“各自为战”到“相互补台”,正副书记带头讲团结顾大局

Machine translation The heading is a machine translation of the original title above. Not reviewed by a human.

Processing status

Analyzed

Passed relevance screening and completed analysis. English title and summary are machine-generated.

Machine assessment Not flagged for closer review. This is a software triage result, not an editorial judgment.

Provenance

What is known about this record and where each part came from.
DeskChina Desk
Publishing institutionCMC Political Work Department
Source outletPLA Daily (解放军报) (pla_daily)
Source languagezh-Hans — an attribute of the source, not of this record
Source-stated publication date2026-06-16
Original URLhttp://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16467569.html
Collected at2026-06-16 17:55:26 — collection metadata, not a publication time
Content fingerprintdc6421e8e391b0dcad4f594d646f393f2f7d6bffa2d5688bcaccbd0dfc6dffa5 — taken when the record was captured, over the stored original title and text
Collection run59
Analysis modelclaude-sonnet-4-6
Prompt versionv1

Every field above is defined in the data dictionary — what it means, when it may be absent, and where it stops being reliable.

Stored source text

Text captured from the source page. Extraction may omit material or include unrelated page elements; consult the original URL when exact wording or completeness matters.

正副书记“补台”记 ——第82集团军某旅某营党委加强班子团结的一段经历 ■马远鹏 闫 斌 解放军报特约记者 杨开明 走下训练场,该营党委正副书记及时沟通,查找训练中的不足。解放军报特约记者 杨开明摄 前不久,第82集团军某旅某营党委许副书记上任不久,就在一次营党委议战议训会前,收到党委张书记一份特殊“见面礼”——一份全营军事训练基本情况和存在问题的分析资料。 翻看数据翔实、问题清晰的资料,许副书记很是感慨:“没想到能这么快这么全面掌握情况,我干好工作更有底数了。” 这样的融洽局面来之不易。此前,这个营的正副书记一度陷入“各自为战”的困境。 当时,该营党委班子调整完成后,张书记一门心思扑在党务工作上,抓教育、整台账、搞活动,时任党委李副书记则按自己的节奏抓军事训练。表面上看二人职责清晰、分工分明,实际上却是各干各的、互不通气,官兵在学习教育和军事训练上频繁切换,活动经常发生冲突,只能重点顾一头。 一次季度考评,该营党务工作成绩虽排名靠前,军事训练成绩却排名倒数。成绩公布后,正在基层调研的一名旅领导察觉到这个问题,便利用列席该营党委组织生活会时机,带领大家剖析查找“各唱各调”“各扫门前雪”等问题,集思广益研究具体整改措施。 “我以前觉得抓党务工作方向没错,也出了一些成绩,但仔细复盘,很多工作是为了抓而抓,跟练兵备战没有挂上钩”“自己一门心思扑在训练场上,觉得把时间练足、把课目练够就行,没有重视党务工作对军事训练的促进作用”……会上,正副书记分别进行了反思剖析。大家讨论感到,党组织正副书记是合作而不是对立,是帮手而不是对手,因此思想上要多沟通,行动上要多协同,干工作要拧成一股绳,主动支持和配合,这样才能彰显组织的力量、团结的力量。 正副书记多次深度交流,共同商定以“相互补台、互为支撑”为原则,建立每周碰头机制,定期沟通党务工作与训练安排,提前统筹时间、人员和场地,避免各自为战;根据当前任务实际,制订针对性的教育计划,让党务工作真正服务练兵一线;坚持训练计划与党务工作同步研究、同步部署、同步检查,重大演训任务前搞好思想动员,训练中出现思想问题也由两位主官共同解决。通过这些措施,逐步推动党务工作与军事训练同频共振、相互促进…… 相互补台,方能好戏连台。一次,上级组织战斗力检验评估。演习进入白热化阶段,“蓝军”不仅在火力上猛烈压制,还运用高技术手段进行心理战,向该营阵地投放了大量虚假信息,部分官兵出现了思想波动。 关键时刻,李副书记沉着指挥火力打击,按预定方案牢牢掌控战场主动。与此同时,张书记迅速靠前适时开展战时政治工作,组织骨干甄别虚假信息、稳定军心,并针对“蓝军”的心理攻势展开反击。两人分工协作,配合默契,演习结束获得评估组高度评价:在复杂电磁环境和心理攻防交织的战场条件下,该营党委正副书记带领班子成员各司其职又相互支撑,射击指挥精准高效,战时政治工作及时有力。 这次取得的成绩,让全营官兵很受鼓舞,接下来的季度考核中,营队成绩进一步跃升。 有了这次成功经历,随后的几次议战议训会上,两位书记不回避、不遮掩,继续查找工作中存在的薄弱环节,相互督促进行整改。当年,该营被评为军事训练一级营、“四铁”先进单位。 从“各自为战”到“相互补台”,正是经历了这样的反思与整改,才有了前文许副书记履新时的那一幕。 前段时间,该营按计划组织协同训练,全营分散配置,多个点位相距数十公里,通信时断时续。面对复杂局面,正副书记协商决定:分别带队,在各自点位既抓训练又抓党务工作,每日定时互通情况、互为依托。 发现对方考虑和处理问题不周,或是工作有漏洞时,他们就赶紧互相拉拉袖子主动提醒。一次,张书记带领通信分队展开演练,但在互通情况时,许副书记敏锐察觉张书记制订的方案存在疏漏,当即提醒并给出优化建议。随后,许副书记结合自己的组训实践,连夜赶制出一份翔实的补充方案发给张书记参照执行。 这种分头带队、互为依托的模式很快显现出效果。哪个方向训练受阻,另一方主动协调支援;哪个方向思想出现波动,另一方及时分享经验、协助化解……两人虽身处不同点位,却始终保持补位状态,演练任务最终圆满完成,多项训法成果得到实战检验。 记者手记 带头讲团结顾大局 该营党委正副书记从“各自为战”到“相互补台”的转变,生动印证了一个道理:团结就是力量,部队建设和练兵备战必须牢固树立“一盘棋”思想。 现实中,一些单位党组织也存在类似现象,分工变成了分家,协作变成了内耗。比如,有的不顾全局,只盯着自己负责的“一亩三分地”,面对“额外”工作消极应付、不愿担当;有的搞本位主义,公私界限模糊,干工作先打个人得失“小算盘”;还有的习惯单打独斗,不重协同联动,等等。以上种种,看似守好了个人的“责任田”,实则是“事不关己、高高挂起”的利己主义在作祟,是党性修养弱化和政绩观偏差的表现。 积力之所举,则无不胜也。在我党我军历史上,“朱毛不分家”“陈离不开粟,粟离不开陈”等佳话广为流传。事实证明,团结是党的生命,团结问题处理得好,工作才能做得好;团结问题处理不好,工作就往往难做好。党员干部特别是领导干部要充分认清团结的重要性,强化“一盘棋”的全局观念,不因分工而割裂责任,不因主责不同而置身事外,遇有任务时主动向前跨一步,看到战友需要时积极伸出援手。班子成员带头讲团结、顾大局,才能感召带动大家心往一处想、劲往一处使,形成“众人拾柴火焰高”的生动局面。

Summary

Machine summary

A battalion party committee under a brigade of the 82nd Group Army resolved a leadership cohesion failure in which the principal secretary focused exclusively on party affairs work while the deputy secretary ran military training independently, producing a unit that ranked near the top in party affairs but near the bottom in training results; a brigade-level leader intervened during a grassroots inspection, triggering a rectification that introduced a weekly coordination mechanism and integrated party affairs work with training planning. The article documents a recurring structural problem in PLA battalion-level party committees: the formal division of labor between principal and deputy secretaries creates incentives for siloed performance optimization rather than combined-arms readiness, and the fix required external intervention rather than self-correction. The 'Four-Iron' rating and the wartime political work vignette during the Blue Force psychological warfare scenario are used to validate the corrected model, extending a pattern in PLA Daily of using concrete unit outcomes to legitimize institutional behavior norms the paper wants to propagate downward.

Machine-generated from the original text, and distinct from the machine translation of the title. Not reviewed by a human. It is a reading of what was published, not a verification of it.

What this record supports

It does not establish that the described events occurred, that any capability exists, or that the institution's stated position is its actual policy.

Cite this record

Two separate claims, cited separately: the item as its publisher issued it, and the record as this corpus holds it.

Source text. CMC Political Work Department. "从“各自为战”到“相互补台”,正副书记带头讲团结顾大局." PLA Daily (解放军报), 2026-06-16. http://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16467569.html.

As held. Indo-Pacific Record, China Desk Corpus, Record 1465, Snapshot — 2026-08-26 (3,574 records).

Processing note. The English title and summary held for this record are machine-generated and have not been reviewed by a human.

The record number and this record path are locators inside the 2026-08-26 snapshot. Neither is a DOI, accession number, permanent identifier, public permalink, or published route. See identifiers and citation guidance.