Indo-Pacific Record

Official defense and security texts, preserved as published and analyzed in context.

Collection is current; analysis is behind it. Records dated after 2026-08-24 are stored and awaiting screening. What these dates mean.

← Corpus by week

Source record CMC Political Work Department · 2026-06-09

当党课有了"哨味",这些沾泥土、冒热气的党课赢得党员认可

Processing status

Awaiting screening

Stored but not yet screened for relevance. No judgment of any kind has been made about this record.

Provenance

What is known about this record and where each part came from.
DeskChina Desk
Publishing institutionCMC Political Work Department
Source outletPLA Daily (解放军报) (pla_daily)
Source languagezh-Hans — an attribute of the source, not of this record
Source-stated publication date2026-06-09
Original URLhttp://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16466241.html
Collected at2026-06-09 15:35:18 — collection metadata, not a publication time
Content fingerprint7feaa85fc3f00f1d7d219b3c18f2b53ba644162f3cac96f26ce3dbce67fafce6 — taken when the record was captured, over the stored original title and text
Collection run52

Every field above is defined in the data dictionary — what it means, when it may be absent, and where it stops being reliable.

Stored source text

Text captured from the source page. Extraction may omit material or include unrelated page elements; consult the original URL when exact wording or completeness matters.

好党课直抵哨位兵心 ■北京卫戍区某部某连党支部书记 郑 帅 刚担任连队党支部书记不久,机关的一次推门听课让我记忆犹新。 当时,检查组人员问了一个看似简单却让我当场语塞的问题:“你讲的党课,跟连队日常执勤教育,到底有什么区别?” 那段时间,我为了上好党课很是上心:翻阅理论书籍、引用经典论述、制作精美课件,力求每堂课都有“高度”“深度”。可我并未认真想过,党课和日常教育,本质区别究竟在哪。 认真反思后,我主动调整方向,尝试在教案中加入大量身边党员的事迹,可党员们对我的调整评价依然不高。问题到底出在哪?我利用党日、执勤间隙和谈心谈话等时机,广泛听取意见。 有人说:“党课讲得挺热闹,可听完回到哨位上,还是不知道该怎么做。”有人直言:“道理都对,但觉得跟每天查验证件、巡逻警戒这些工作没太大关联。”还有老骨干提出:“党课能不能有点‘哨味’?别总讲大道理,多讲讲咱们在哨位上应该怎么干。” 我听了这些意见,很受触动:党课不能为讲而讲,必须紧贴执勤实际、紧贴党员思想实际。从那以后,我开始更多留心发生在哨位上的故事。 有一次,某哨位党员因夜间疲惫出现犯困,我没有简单批评,而是结合这件事在党课上组织讨论:“怎样在哨位上体现坚强党性?”大家你一言我一语,逐渐形成共识——党员的先进性,就体现在每一次敬礼、每一句口令、每一秒坚守里。 有段时间,连队担负某警卫任务,几名党员主动放弃轮休、连续值守。我在党课上请他们讲述心路历程。有人说:“当时没想那么多,就觉得这个哨位交给我,决不能退。”这句话引起现场共鸣。大家也逐渐意识到,党性从来不是抽象的口号,而是哨位上的每一次坚定选择和无悔坚守。 这些沾泥土、带露珠、冒热气的党课,往往能赢得党员普遍认可。 党员的思想是动态的变化的。一次,连队连续担负多项高强度执勤任务,有党员私下吐槽:“每次加班加点的都是我们几个骨干,为什么?”这句话提醒了我:党课必须紧跟活思想。我立即着手准备,利用任务间隙,组织党员来到连队荣誉室上了一堂“微党课”。 我指着墙上连队组建初期的老照片说:“那时候条件艰苦,哨位分散,第一批党员骨干每天要多走十几公里查哨,从没问过为什么。去年执行重大任务,党员突击队第一批进入核心区、最后一批撤出,也没人问过为什么……”这次教育后,许多党员主动发言,表示要把每一次执勤、每一次任务当作检验党性的“试金石”。 这几段经历让我明白了一件事:党课不是高高在上的说教,也不能与任务脱节“两张皮”,它本质上是一次次面对面的思想对表——让党员在哨位上看清自己的身份,在平凡重复的执勤中记得自己为什么出发。 真正管用的党课,往往不追求讲得多漂亮,而是让人听完站上哨位时,心里多一分坚定。 (程文杰整理)

What this record supports

It does not establish that the described events occurred, that any capability exists, or that the institution's stated position is its actual policy.

Cite this record

Two separate claims, cited separately: the item as its publisher issued it, and the record as this corpus holds it.

Source text. CMC Political Work Department. "当党课有了"哨味",这些沾泥土、冒热气的党课赢得党员认可." PLA Daily (解放军报), 2026-06-09. http://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16466241.html.

As held. Indo-Pacific Record, China Desk Corpus, Record 1219, Snapshot — 2026-08-26 (3,574 records).

Processing note. This record has not been screened. No judgment of any kind has been made about it.

The record number and this record path are locators inside the 2026-08-26 snapshot. Neither is a DOI, accession number, permanent identifier, public permalink, or published route. See identifiers and citation guidance.